Higher Education’s Leadership Crisis


Columbia’s Minouche Shafik is the latest Ivy League resignation. Will it prove a turning point?


By Eric J. Gertler

The Wall Street Journal

August 15, 2024


Will the resignation of Columbia University President Minouche Shafik be a turning point for higher education? Her tenure, as well as those of Penn’s Liz Magill and Harvard’s Claudine Gay, suggests that some of these elite universities are selecting the wrong people for the top job.


Some have shown promise in dealing with the immediate challenges. Vanderbilt’s Daniel Diermeier and Dartmouth’s Sian Beilock have been proactive in understanding the need to provide students with clear guidelines balancing the need for free speech and safety.


But the job of a university president has dimensions that go far beyond dealing with this sort of crisis. Most college presidents have résumés that stand out in the academic world of scholarship, theory and ceremony. That background isn’t always suited for a role that requires one to juggle the competing interests of students, donors, alumni, faculty, trustees and community members.


Today’s universities are multibillion-dollar enterprises that are far more complex than they were a generation ago. Harvard now charges incoming students $85,000 in tuition and living expenses. It has more than 25,000 students and almost 20,000 employees, including some 2,500 faculty members. It operates more than a dozen graduate schools, manages an endowment of more than $50 billion, and has a large and growing real-estate footprint in Cambridge, Mass. It is making massive investments in world-class research facilities in emerging and complex scientific disciplines.


Columbia and New York University are two of their city’s largest landowners. Many state schools are the centers of regional development hubs, and smaller schools, even community colleges, have become engines of growth in every state.


Oversight of such complex organizations requires the skills akin to a Fortune 1000 CEO. The academic mission is crucial, but university presidents spend much of their time on nonacademic matters—fundraising, budget management, real-estate development, hiring and firing, public-relations crises, managing boards, and sensitive community relations—for which they have had little previous experience.


While some provosts and deans have the skills to excel as university presidents, others don’t. Trustees have a responsibility to expand the recruiting pool for university presidents. Successful CEOs have experience in running a playbook for different situations and are “battle tested.” When dealing with crisis, they can rely on previous experiences that many current university leaders lack.


Trustees should also consider leaders from the military, political and nonprofit worlds. When Gen. Dwight Eisenhower became president of Columbia in 1948, he lacked the academic credentials of a typical university president. But he had the foresight and skills to handle a university environment and its concomitant challenges.


More recently, former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels reenergized Purdue University with innovative thinking and confident leadership. Michael Crow, an academic innovator, has taken advantage of his unconventional experience as an adviser to government agencies and a designer of knowledge enterprises to remake Arizona State University. Shirley Jackson’s experience at Bell Labs and as a White House adviser enhanced her tenure at Rensselaer Polytechnic.


Trustees must recognize that their roles are no longer simply titular, broaden their search for leaders, and be bold enough to make tough decisions when they realize they have selected the wrong person for the job.


Mr. Gertler is executive chairman and CEO of U.S. News & World Report.



October 8, 2025
Cornell and George Mason have allegedly violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
October 7, 2025
The Daily Signal By Hannah Fay October 07, 2025 "On Sept. 5, we filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Education and the Department of Justice against our alma mater, Davidson College. We did not make this decision out of anger towards Davidson but from our hope that Davidson can become an institution of free expression that encourages students to pursue truth. We had chosen Davidson as student athletes and recall being high school seniors, eager to attend a college where we could simultaneously pursue a high level of athletics and academics and be challenged to become better competitors, students and, most importantly, people. We believed that Davidson would be the perfect place for our personal growth, where we would be encouraged to encounter new ideas while contributing our own. Little did we know that Davidson does not welcome students with our convictions . During our senior year, we decided to restart the Davidson chapter of Young Americans for Freedom, a national conservative student organization, which had been disbanded. With this decision, we knew that we would receive backlash from peers. Before the school semester even started, we received hateful online comments such as “Who let y’all out of the basement?” We saw how other universities treated conservatives and had even experienced hostility firsthand at Davidson, being called “homophobic” or “uninclusive” for our involvement in Fellowship of Christian Athletes, whose statement of faith declares that marriage is between a man and a woman. We realized that, although we were friends with progressive individuals for the past few years, fully aware and accepting of their political beliefs, they would likely distance themselves from us once they learned of ours. While we were prepared for this reaction from our peers, we did not expect to receive such opposition from Davidson administrators. We naively believed that despite the college’s leftist indoctrination efforts (requiring cultural diversity courses, mandating student athletics to watch a documentary arguing that all white people were inherently racist, having a DEI office, designating secluded spaces for LGBTQ+ students, etc.), they would still surely encourage free speech. After all, a liberal arts institution should cultivate a space where students can freely inquire, peacefully debate, and form decisions for themselves. Before the semester even began, we faced resistance from the administration as we could not get approval to restart the club from the Director of Student Activities Emily Eisenstadt for three weeks after a follow-up email and a faculty advisor request. Other conservative organizations also faced irresponsiveness from the Director of Student Activities. However, when leftist groups wanted to bring Gavin Newsom to campus, they had no problem getting a swift response. Despite continued administrative opposition, we hosted speakers, including pro-life activist Abby Johnson and President Ronald Reagan’s economic advisor Arthur Laffer; organized events such as the 9/11 “Never Forget”; and attempted to engage in civil conversations about abortion. Our efforts even led to us being awarded “Chapter Rookie of the Year” by Young America’s Foundation. Our most notable event, and the reason for our complaint, was our “Stand with Israel” project, in which we placed 1,195 Israeli flags into the ground to memorialize the innocent victims of the Oct. 7 Massacre by Hamas. We also laid out pamphlets on tables in the library and student union titled, “The Five Myths About Israel Perpetrated by the Pro-Hamas Left,” provided to us by Young America’s Foundation. This event led to two significant outcomes. First, our flags were stolen overnight. When we brought this to the attention of Davidson administrators and the Honor Council, they dismissed the case and chose not to investigate, despite their so-called commitment to the Honor Code. Second, on Feb. 26, 2025, over four months after the event, we received an email from Director of Rights and Responsibilities Mak Thompkins informing us that we faced charges of “violating” the Code of Responsibility. We had allegedly made students feel “threatened and unsafe” due to our distribution of pamphlets that allegedly promoted “Islamophobia.” This was ironic to us, given that we did not even know who our accusers were, let alone not ever having interacted with them. What’s more, we knew of Jewish students who genuinely felt targeted because of the rampant antisemitism on our campus. For example, a massive Palestine flag was hung across our main academic building the day after President Donald Trump won the election, and the student group ‘Cats Against Imperialism’—Davidson’s college moniker is “Wildcats”—distributed pamphlets promoting their aggressive pro-Palestinian agenda. Yet, unlike us, they faced no consequences. Davidson’s biased treatment towards pro-Israel students led to our filing a civil rights complaint with the DOJ and Department of Education. Davidson College must be held accountable for its blatant discrimination and violation of Title VI and Title IX ; it should not receive any federal funding until it complies with the federal law. In light of the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, it is now more important than ever that higher education promotes free expression. Colleges and universities are predominantly controlled by leftists who demonize conservatives and the values we stand for. If Davidson cannot commit to shaping students who understand the equal dignity of every person made in the image of God, regardless of religion, it risks corrupting individuals and prompting them to support, or even commit, acts of political violence. We hope that Davidson will become a community that values all perspectives and treats all students with dignity and respect, including the Jewish population. Though we are not of Jewish descent, we strongly support Israel and the Jewish people and faced discrimination based on the content of our support. If we had, as our counterparts did, expressed antisemitism, Davidson officials would have treated us differently. Hannah Fay is a communications fellow for media and public relations at The Heritage Foundation.
September 21, 2025
Evidence Backs Trump on Higher Ed’s Bias
Show More