Harvard Says It’s Handing Out Too Many A’s. Students Are Fighting Back.


Report from Ivy League school finds rampant grade inflation, but students complain administration is moving goal posts

Read Full Article at The Wall Street Journal


CAMBRIDGE, Mass.—The last time Jake Kamnikar remembers receiving anything other than an A on his transcript was in third-grade art class. He is now a freshman at Harvard.


That streak could end soon.


A recent internal report found that Harvard is dishing out too many A’s, and that the current undergrad system is “failing to perform the key functions of grading” and “damaging the academic culture of the College more generally.”


The report prompted uproar from some Harvard students who say they already study a lot, sleep very little and face immense stress to perform academically. Many feel they worked hard to get into Harvard, only for the school to contemplate moving the goal posts.


“You admitted these students because they have straight A’s, and now they’re getting a lot of A’s, and it’s, like, ‘This is a problem.’ And I’m thinking, how on earth is that a problem?” said Summer Tan, a Harvard senior.


Harvard’s report on its undergraduate college found that about 60% of grades were A’s during the 2024-25 school year, a jump from about 25% in 2005-06. The median GPA upon graduation is now 3.83, up from 3.29 in 1985.


The average time students spend studying outside class has barely changed, from 6.08 hours a week for each of their courses in fall 2006 to 6.3 hours this spring, according to the report by Amanda Claybaugh, Harvard’s dean of undergraduate education. New faculty reported surprise at how lenient grading is, and nearly all expressed “serious concern” about grade inflation.


Making the Grade


An internal report showed Harvard College is giving out more ‘A’ grades and students are graduating with higher GPAs.


“We’re not trying to make Harvard something that it’s not,” Claybaugh said in an interview. “We’re trying to bring it back to what it was when it was really at its best.”


The report includes recommendations to curb grade inflation and restore rigor. Harvard is considering introducing a limited number of A-plus grades, and displaying the median grade for every course on transcripts to provide more context to employers and admissions committees. 


Students have bashed and bemoaned the report across campus. One told the student newspaper she was crying “the whole entire day.” Some cited the college’s increased selectivity in admissions as justification for higher grades.


One challenge in addressing grade inflation, particularly for professors, is the fear that cracking down could send enrollment plummeting. Claybaugh plans to host a dinner with faculty to discuss grading plans, and has encouraged them to revert to how they graded 10 years ago.


Steven Pinker, a professor who teaches an introductory psychology course, said he has felt compelled to inflate grades at a similar rate to the collegewide data, even though he believes student performance has sunk. 


Pinker has given a similar final exam since 2003, and now sees students score 10 percentage points lower on the multiple-choice portion. (He doesn’t know whether his sample group is the same, though: It is possible better students now are skipping his course in favor of a neuroscience one).


“A course with a reputation for a tough grading distribution will repel students,” Pinker said. “Everyone has an incentive to keep inflating grades unless everyone else stops simultaneously.” A separate study published by Harvard this spring, however, found that course difficulty and grades had a minimal effect on the scores students gave instructors on evaluations.


Many students recognize both sides of the grade-inflation argument. Alfred Williamson sees a disparity between his two majors. He said he has coasted through some classes for his government major, but has to work harder in his physics major.


“The classes where you can get away with not doing readings and not studying and not engaging in discussions, and still do well—that’s the real problem,” said Williamson, a sophomore.


But too much rigor disincentivizes academic exploration, students say. Williamson thought twice about majoring in physics because he worried it could lower his GPA and prove challenging if he applies to law school.


Tan, the college senior who had straight A’s in high school, said she sleeps about six hours per night, though during some stretches of college it has been three or four. She is juggling a part-time job at an ice-cream shop and about 35 hours a week as vice president of a campus politics center, among other extracurriculars.


“It’s not like I’ve managed to breeze my way through Harvard,” she said, pointing to B’s and some humanities courses with heavy reading loads.


Kamnikar, the freshman and economics and psychology double-major, thinks Harvard students should expect to be held to higher standards. But, he added that “learning should be inquisitive and not unnecessarily stressful or demanding.”


The root of Harvard students’ stress is generally their ambition, Claybaugh said. “When they weren’t all getting A’s, they were stressed. And now that they are all getting A’s, they are still stressed,” she said.


Grade inflation isn’t confined to Harvard; the problem has drawn President Trump’s scrutiny. He asked colleges to “commit to grade integrity” in his administration’s “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” an agreement it wants universities to sign in exchange for federal-funding advantages.


“It has reached a comical level of inflation,” said Christopher Schorr, director of the higher-education reform initiative at America First Policy Institute, a conservative think tank.


Princeton University capped the number of A’s starting in 2004, but discontinued that practice after finding the policy increased stress, among other issues. Other schools didn’t follow suit, creating uneven comparisons for graduates.


Experts hope that this time around other schools will follow Harvard. Claybaugh said she has heard from peer institutions since the report was released.


In any case, the debate has been raging for years. In 1894, less than a decade after the grading system was put into place, a standards committee at Harvard said that A’s and B’s were sometimes given “too readily.”


Write to Roshan Fernandez at roshan.fernandez@wsj.com


Corrections & Amplifications
Harvard students spent an average of 6.3 hours a week this spring studying outside of class for each of their courses, compared with 6.08 hours a week in fall 2006. An earlier version of this article incorrectly failed to state that the weekly study hours are per course. (Corrected on Nov. 12.)



Read Full Article at The Wall Street Journal


December 11, 2025
Student evaluations subject professors to perverse incentives.
December 10, 2025
Written by John Craig December 10, 2025 On October 27, the Manhattan Institution’s City Journal published a major, breakthrough analysis of the performance of 100 prominent US (and one Canadian) universities and colleges, “Introducing the City Journal College Rankings,” For the first time, this new performance system includes data on measures (68 in all) like freedom of expression, viewpoint diversity tolerance, quality of instruction, investment payoff, and campus politicization that are not considered in the other major higher ed ranking systems. How did Davidson measure up in City Journal’s performance assessment? On a scale of one (bottom) to five (top) stars , Davidson is among the 63 schools that received 2 stars. Schools that, according to City Journal, have “Mostly average to below-average scores in all categories with no particularly noteworthy strengths. Significant, focused policy changes are needed at these schools.” (Full rankings available here College Rankings | Rankings ) To summarize the methodology, the City Journal team selected 100 schools that are highly touted by other ranking systems, widely known to the American public, and/or of high regional importance. The researchers gathered data on 68 variables across 21 categories covering four major aspects of on- and off-campus life. The Educational Experience categories were Faculty Ideological Pluralism, Faculty Teaching Quality, Faculty Research Quality, Faculty Speech Climate, Curricular Rigor, and Heterodox Infrastructure; the Leadership Quality categories were Commitment to Meritocracy, Support for Free Speech, and Resistance to Politicization; the Outcomes categories were Quality of Alumni Network, Value Added to Career, and Value Added to Education; and the Student Experience categories were Student Ideological Pluralism, Student Free Speech, Student Political Tolerance, Student Social Life, Student Classroom Experience, Campus ROTC, Student Community Life, and Jewish Campus Climate. No other higher ed ranking system includes as many variables. (Read more about methodology at College Rankings | Methods ) The data included publicly available information from sources such as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the Department of Education’s College Scorecard, and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression’s College Free Speech Rankings. The researchers also developed original measures for the project, such as the ideological balance of student political organizations and the partisan makeup of faculty campaign contributions. Each variable was coded so that higher values mean better performance and was weighted to reflect relative importance. For example, student ideological pluralism (as measured by self-reported student ideology and the left-right balance of student organizations) accounts for 5 percent of a school’s score while City Journal’s estimate of how many years it will take the typical student to recoup their educational investment to attend a given college accounts for 12.5 percent. A school’s overall score is the sum of points across the 21 categories, with the top possible score being 100. While the assessment system is for the most part hard-data-based, it has, like other ranking systems, subjective elements—like the weighing system. So methodological challenges will come and will doubtlessly lead to improvements the next time around. That said, the methodology strikes me as defensible and a marked improvement over that of other popular rating systems. I will conclude with some comments on the findings. Note that the Average score (out of 100) for the 100 institutions is 46 and the median score is 45.73—so overall, this is not a “high performance” group of institutions. No institution receives a 5-Star rating, and only two receive a 4-Star rating (University of Florida and University of Texas at Austin). Only 11 schools receive a 3-Star rating—Having “Mixed results across the four categories, showing strengths in some and weakness in others. These schools typically have several clear paths to improvement.” Because assessment scores are generally low and tightly clustered in the middle, the rankings by score are misleading: Davidson, at 51.16 with a rank of 25, looks to be in the top quartile (between Princeton and Georgetown), but in fact gets just a 2-Star assessment
October 30, 2025
Decades of big spending, new federal funding cuts and a changing view of higher education created a perfect storm; ‘Spending Your Tuition On Its Mistakes’
Show More