How Trump’s Anti-DEI Push Is Unraveling College Scholarships


Some programs are being discontinued, while others are being broadened to include more students


The Wall Street Journal

By Tali Arbel

July 5, 2025


Colleges, companies and philanthropic organizations are retooling millions of dollars in scholarships that for years supported minority students.


Under threat from the Trump administration and activist groups over diversity programs, some are scrapping scholarships entirely. Others are broadening the programs to focus on low-income students in general or tweaking applications to try to keep their original missions. 


“We’re seeing widespread fear of litigation prompt many scholarship providers to re-evaluate,” said Jackie Bright, president of the National Scholarship Providers Association.


In June, $56 million in scholarships in the NSPA database had race, ethnicity or gender criteria, a decrease of 25% from March 2023. The database is a small but indicative slice of the billions of dollars of financial aid available in the U.S.


As part of President Trump’s crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion programs, the Education Department told schools in February that using race in financial aid could threaten their federal funding. Some universities are under investigation for their scholarships.


Even before Trump took office, the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that found it unconstitutional to consider race in university admissions had forced changes to scholarships. Many interpreted the decision to mean that other race-conscious programs in higher education could be “legally suspect,” said Suzanne Eckes, a professor at the School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. State officials and legislatures also pushed to eliminate race from aid.


Education experts said the changes could make it harder for minority students to graduate from college. “There’s going to be a decline in college affordability and completion rates for those students,” Bright said.


Killing the scholarship


The University of Michigan’s alumni association in March told students it was canceling the Lead Scholars program, a week before the school announced it was closing its DEI offices. The alumni group said it ended the scholarship to comply with the law and with guidance from the federal government. 


More than 800 students have received awards since Lead Scholars began in 2008. It was meant to support minority students after the state of Michigan banned using racial preferences in public-college admissions, and offered at least $5,000 a year as well as community events. 


Ana Trujillo Garcia, a rising senior studying art and design, with a focus on furniture, said the financial benefits—$5,000 a year—have been important, but so was the environment Lead Scholars created. She made friends through the program and shared her art at a cultural showcase.


“ It was great to have a community of only minorities,” she said. “’Cause on campus, you see everyone. But in that one, you saw everyone that was like you.”


Other scholarships have dwindled or are on pause. The Justice Department in April said that the state of Illinois and six schools—including Northwestern University, Loyola University of Chicago and the University of Chicago—suspended a scholarship for minority graduate students called Diversifying Higher Education Faculty in Illinois after the department threatened a lawsuit over racial discrimination.


“This Department of Justice is committed to rooting DEI out of American institutions,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi. 


The Illinois Board of Higher Education said the program wasn’t suspended, but the state had agreed to evaluate the fellowship—which is enshrined in state law—along with the Illinois General Assembly.


Northwestern withdrew from the program in March, a school spokesman said. Loyola and the University of Chicago didn’t respond to requests for comment. The University of Illinois-Chicago on its website said its participation in the program was paused because of “funding restrictions from sponsor.”


Changing the Scope


Earlier this year, McDonald’s removed a Hispanic-ancestry requirement from its 40-year-old Hacer college scholarship program, after a lawsuit from an activist group that challenges the use of race in scholarships. Instead, Hacer applicants must show their contribution to the Hispanic community through activities and leadership. 


Scholarship recipients said the money was important to their success, but winning the prize also made them feel recognized as Latinos who had overcome barriers. 


“It felt like you were seen because of your accomplishments, but also because you are part of a group that’s been marginalized for years,” said Erick Soto, a 2024 graduate from the University of Arkansas and 2020 Hacer recipient. His scholarship was for $20,000 over four years.


McDonald’s declined to comment beyond a January statement saying it disagreed with the claim that the scholarship was discriminatory but wanted to protect the program. 


Edward Blum, whose group was behind the lawsuit that led to the 2023 Supreme Court decision that banned affirmative action, also brought the McDonald’s lawsuit.


“You can’t remedy past discrimination with new discrimination,” he said. “Treating people differently because of their race or ethnicity is legally wrong.”


The Gates Foundation in April removed race and ethnicity from the Gates Scholarship, saying anyone eligible for a federal Pell Grant could apply. The foundation said on its website that it began evaluating in September how to reach the broadest range of low-income students and that it takes “its compliance obligations seriously.” It didn’t return requests for comment. 


Blum, the activist, said he had filed a complaint in April with the Internal Revenue Service, asking it to investigate the Gates Foundation’s tax-exempt status because of discrimination against white students. 


In March, Hawkeye Community College in Waterloo, Iowa, sent LaTanya Graves a letter saying the $250-a-semester scholarship her family set up for Black students in 2020 likely had to change because of the government’s position on “nondiscrimination obligations” for schools that get federal funding. Hawkeye said out of more than 460 scholarships its foundation awarded each year, 10 had race as criteria. 


Graves, who had created the scholarship in honor of her mother, bristled at the letter. But she said she blamed the government, not the school. 

“How can the government dictate what a family sets up?” she said.


Write to Tali Arbel at tali.arbel@wsj.com


Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8


Appeared in the July 7, 2025, print edition as 'Trump’s Anti-DEI Push Unravels College Scholarships'.


How Trump’s Anti-DEI Push Is Unraveling College Scholarships - WSJ




October 8, 2025
Cornell and George Mason have allegedly violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
October 7, 2025
The Daily Signal By Hannah Fay October 07, 2025 "On Sept. 5, we filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Education and the Department of Justice against our alma mater, Davidson College. We did not make this decision out of anger towards Davidson but from our hope that Davidson can become an institution of free expression that encourages students to pursue truth. We had chosen Davidson as student athletes and recall being high school seniors, eager to attend a college where we could simultaneously pursue a high level of athletics and academics and be challenged to become better competitors, students and, most importantly, people. We believed that Davidson would be the perfect place for our personal growth, where we would be encouraged to encounter new ideas while contributing our own. Little did we know that Davidson does not welcome students with our convictions . During our senior year, we decided to restart the Davidson chapter of Young Americans for Freedom, a national conservative student organization, which had been disbanded. With this decision, we knew that we would receive backlash from peers. Before the school semester even started, we received hateful online comments such as “Who let y’all out of the basement?” We saw how other universities treated conservatives and had even experienced hostility firsthand at Davidson, being called “homophobic” or “uninclusive” for our involvement in Fellowship of Christian Athletes, whose statement of faith declares that marriage is between a man and a woman. We realized that, although we were friends with progressive individuals for the past few years, fully aware and accepting of their political beliefs, they would likely distance themselves from us once they learned of ours. While we were prepared for this reaction from our peers, we did not expect to receive such opposition from Davidson administrators. We naively believed that despite the college’s leftist indoctrination efforts (requiring cultural diversity courses, mandating student athletics to watch a documentary arguing that all white people were inherently racist, having a DEI office, designating secluded spaces for LGBTQ+ students, etc.), they would still surely encourage free speech. After all, a liberal arts institution should cultivate a space where students can freely inquire, peacefully debate, and form decisions for themselves. Before the semester even began, we faced resistance from the administration as we could not get approval to restart the club from the Director of Student Activities Emily Eisenstadt for three weeks after a follow-up email and a faculty advisor request. Other conservative organizations also faced irresponsiveness from the Director of Student Activities. However, when leftist groups wanted to bring Gavin Newsom to campus, they had no problem getting a swift response. Despite continued administrative opposition, we hosted speakers, including pro-life activist Abby Johnson and President Ronald Reagan’s economic advisor Arthur Laffer; organized events such as the 9/11 “Never Forget”; and attempted to engage in civil conversations about abortion. Our efforts even led to us being awarded “Chapter Rookie of the Year” by Young America’s Foundation. Our most notable event, and the reason for our complaint, was our “Stand with Israel” project, in which we placed 1,195 Israeli flags into the ground to memorialize the innocent victims of the Oct. 7 Massacre by Hamas. We also laid out pamphlets on tables in the library and student union titled, “The Five Myths About Israel Perpetrated by the Pro-Hamas Left,” provided to us by Young America’s Foundation. This event led to two significant outcomes. First, our flags were stolen overnight. When we brought this to the attention of Davidson administrators and the Honor Council, they dismissed the case and chose not to investigate, despite their so-called commitment to the Honor Code. Second, on Feb. 26, 2025, over four months after the event, we received an email from Director of Rights and Responsibilities Mak Thompkins informing us that we faced charges of “violating” the Code of Responsibility. We had allegedly made students feel “threatened and unsafe” due to our distribution of pamphlets that allegedly promoted “Islamophobia.” This was ironic to us, given that we did not even know who our accusers were, let alone not ever having interacted with them. What’s more, we knew of Jewish students who genuinely felt targeted because of the rampant antisemitism on our campus. For example, a massive Palestine flag was hung across our main academic building the day after President Donald Trump won the election, and the student group ‘Cats Against Imperialism’—Davidson’s college moniker is “Wildcats”—distributed pamphlets promoting their aggressive pro-Palestinian agenda. Yet, unlike us, they faced no consequences. Davidson’s biased treatment towards pro-Israel students led to our filing a civil rights complaint with the DOJ and Department of Education. Davidson College must be held accountable for its blatant discrimination and violation of Title VI and Title IX ; it should not receive any federal funding until it complies with the federal law. In light of the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, it is now more important than ever that higher education promotes free expression. Colleges and universities are predominantly controlled by leftists who demonize conservatives and the values we stand for. If Davidson cannot commit to shaping students who understand the equal dignity of every person made in the image of God, regardless of religion, it risks corrupting individuals and prompting them to support, or even commit, acts of political violence. We hope that Davidson will become a community that values all perspectives and treats all students with dignity and respect, including the Jewish population. Though we are not of Jewish descent, we strongly support Israel and the Jewish people and faced discrimination based on the content of our support. If we had, as our counterparts did, expressed antisemitism, Davidson officials would have treated us differently. Hannah Fay is a communications fellow for media and public relations at The Heritage Foundation.
September 21, 2025
Evidence Backs Trump on Higher Ed’s Bias
Show More